BRINGING UP THE REAR: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell

Almost as soon as the polls had closed this past November and the midterm elections were behind us, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) stated that making sure that Obama is a one-term president was the GOP’s most important priority.

Well, first let me state the obvious… McConnell is a jackass.  If the United States Senate has a Human Resources department, someone needs to get this guy a copy of his job description because he’s completely lost touch with what he and all of our other elected officials are sent to Washington D.C. to do.

I know that a politician’s job is to win elections, but no one elected Mitch or anyone else to work in opposition to the best interests of the American people.

And don’t start accusing me of being a member of the “Obama Fan Club,” because I’m not.  Obama has proven himself to be a terrible crisis president.  He has single-handedly managed to take what was unquestionably an inherited economic disaster on the scale of The Great Depression, and make it, not only his problem, but also his fault.

He went from being a man of the people, to being the best friend Wall Street could ever have hoped for, and for that the Republicans accuse him of being a socialist, while the left accuses him of being too much the centrist who has turned his back on their progressive agenda.  He makes seeking bipartisan consensus look like a pathetic need to be liked by everyone at school.  It’s flat-out dizzying to watch, and makes John Stewart’s job on The Daily Show far to easy.

Coincidentally (and proving that great minds do think alike),  The Atlantic published an article this month about McConnell, titled, “Strict Obstructionist,” and it’s certainly worth reading. Here’s a quote…

“McConnell called TARP’s passage “one of the finest moments in the history of the Senate.” Obama took over expecting this spirit to endure. But from the outset, McConnell blocked or frustrated just about everything the administration tried to do, including the government’s distribution of TARP funds, in January 2009, just three months after McConnell voted to authorize them.”

Although, at many times in our history, when our nation has faced real problems, the Republicans and Democrats have put their differences aside, placing the interests of the nation ahead of anything related to partisan politics in order to do what’s right for the people of this country.  But this idea is entirely foreign to McConnell.

McConnell and the GOP have made it clear that they will spend the next two years blocking anything that has even the slightest potential to make Obama look good in 2012, regardless of the impact to the American people.  It would seem that the brain trust over at the GOP actually believes that even if Americans are starving in the streets come 2012, it’s a good thing for them.

Obviously, what we have here are some low three-digit SAT scores at work.  Let’s play it out and see where the GOP’s strategy is headed.

As I write this, the Obama Administration has all but finalized a so-called compromise that will extend the Bush tax cuts for Warren Buffet and Bill Gates in exchange for extending unemployment benefits for another 13 months.  It’s either that, or something like six or seven million people in this country will soon have no income as they struggle to survive in our depressed economy that hasn’t even begun to replace the tens of millions of jobs lost over the last few years.  I don’t want to play economist here, but that doesn’t sound like it will lead to an increase in consumer spending does it?  Or am I missing something here?

At the same time, extending the Bush tax cuts for those with annual incomes over $250,000… which is about one percent of the population, by the way… besides increasing the deficit, will do what exactly?

The Republicans want me to believe that we need to keep the tax cuts in place because of something about small business owners creating jobs and rich people trickling down their good fortune on the rest of us, but that hasn’t happened for the last ten years, so what the heck are they talking about?  It’s as if they think that by repeating something they heard Art Laffer say during the Reagan years over and over again, it makes it true.  Like when they go into that incessant drumbeat about reducing the deficit being the country’s number one priority, even though you’d be hard pressed to find 100 people on the streets of any major U.S. city that would pick that for our top priority off a list of alternatives.

So, here we go… Mitch McConnell, who has been described as having “the natural charisma of an oyster,” and his GOP pals proceed to block anything that might make our lives better for the next 18 months, after which time we’re not going to do anything but return to the moronic mudslinging on Fox News, which will be in its fear-mongering glory by that point as they point out all the ways Americans are either circling the drain or have already gone down it.  Because by that time we will be two years worse off than we are now, unemployment benefits, assuming they are extended for 13 months this time, will have provided recipients with enough money for bread and water, we will have lost another five million homes to foreclosure and even the reported unemployment rate will be solidly in double digits.

Now, close your eyes and picture what you know it’s like today all over America and imagine that everything that’s keeping you up at night now, at least on occasion, is two years WORSE than it is now.  Your house that had already lost much of its value, has dropped another fifty grand, not that it matters because there aren’t anymore people left in this country who have 860 FICO scores, 30% down payments saved up, who don’t already have the homes they want and aren’t worried about losing their jobs.

So… whose running for President in 2012… or, the better question might be… who isn’t running, because economic times as I’ve just described lead to things like the Tea Party… Ron Paul… Ralph Nader… can you say “H. Ross Perot in 1992?”

The Republican primaries stage a debate with 12 hopefuls on stage… everyone from Sarah Palin to Mitt Romney… to Bobby Jindal… to God only knows.  The Christian Right doesn’t like one side, and the Tea Party can’t stand the other.

For a single candidate to emerge victorious, he or she would need to be a conservative-populist-Christian-Wall-Streeter-Deficithawk-Pro-Militarty individual who claims to be committed to stopping the wars still raging in Afghanistan and Iraq, while preventing Iran from building nukes, that is friendly to the global concerns of China and the G20, and has a vision for lowering taxes without increasing the deficit.  If you thought McCain had problems last time getting the support of his party, this next time out is going to be indescribable.

Of course, Obama is running for reelection in 2012, and he’s out on the campaign trail touting accomplishments like health care and financial reform, trade deals with South Korea and the like, and sniping at Republicans for standing in the way of change.

Want to know what happens?

The election is a three- or maybe even a four-way race, a’la 1992.  The Tea Party candidate actually manages to win 10 percent of the Republican vote, and Ron Paul or at least a reasonable facsimile wins another 12 percent.  The main stream Republican, who has had to try to please so many masters that he’s got enough wholes in him to do a pretty good Swiss cheese imitation, has become the party’s choice because he or she is the banking industry’s favorite.  There’s an Independent candidate as well, siphoning votes from the middle that is so totally disenchanted with Obama that’s they’d rather vote for Dubya again.

And as the dust settles, Obama wins his second term with 34 percent of the vote, as the Republicans keep control of the House, and the Senate officially becomes the political equivalent of the 1960s children’s television program, Romper Room.

Oh sure, Obama’s approval rating is 28 percent, and no president has ever been reelected with unemployment over 10 percent, but it doesn’t matter because the alternative candidates have either destroyed each other during the campaign, or were just plain too nutty to begin with to win a national election.  And unless Obama is caught having sex with Bill Clinton under the desk in the Oval Office, and then lies about it on national television, he’ll get 35 percent of the vote from the youth, inner city, college, and dyed-in-the-wool Democrat crowds, and that’s all he’ll need in the sort of open field race that will result from our economy being that much worse 18 months from now.

Mitch McConnell, who doesn’t come up for reelection until 2016, will be sporting one of his stupid deer-in-headlights looks as he tells the cameras that the Republicans are prepared to work towards bipartisan solutions to the nations problems and that what we need are further tax cuts.  But Obama, now safely in his second terms can’t stop picturing McConnell in a clown suit as he watches him bemoan the election’s outcome.

Yes, it’s 2012… roughly five years into our Great Recession, if we’re still calling it that positive a euphemism.  Obama is back for another four years, absent any real mandate, and with a completely dysfunctional legislature, as he stares at the worst U.S. and global economy ever.  At the end of his second term we will be wrapping up our first “lost decade,” and hoping for the sort of recovery we had back in 1936.

Obama’s first priorities will be to stabilize our nation’s financial institutions, who by then with every third or fourth house in or near foreclosure, will need to be bailed out once again… and the passage of an economic stimulus bill that will put Americans back to work.  Oh yeah, and something about reducing our dependence on foreign oil with green jobs, education, and infrastructure… and bridges… I’m thinking we’ll need to fix lots more bridges.

It’s a fate accompli, I’m afraid, because Mitch’s plan is already set in stone and underway.  And, since I will likely be drinking heavily most days when all this happens, I’d better congratulate him now…

Nicely done, Mitch!  Crackerjack work, as a matter of fact.

Laissez les bon temps roulez!

Mandelman out.


Comments

  1. acumen says

    http://tinyurl.com/2b22wbh

  2. catherine says

    come on, you said that everything he has done has made a bad situation worse.......

    you detail out the destruction..............

    unemployment has ramped from the 5.2 Bush had when the Democrats (including messiah oilybama) took over control of our finances and CONGRESS in 2006.

    Oilybama and Pelosi and Reid's names are on every TARP bill and every bill financing the wars, EVERYONE OF THEM but that didn't stop them from spending every second bashing Bush to remove him from office...............

    I have no problem with ANYONE wanting to remove this Jimmah Carter on steroids (legally and non threatenly) as the other SIDE HAD NO problem gladly, loudly, proudly bashing Bush outta office. I get mad when THEY do it and complain if anyone else does it. This man is incompetent, everything, EVERYTHING has been made worse, there is not one pocket of greatness that has happened in anything he has done.

    Food, gas, war deaths, deficit, unemployment ALL HUGELY WORSE.

    McConnell has many problems, that he wants to remove Oilybama in a LEGAL, NON THREATENING WAY IN 23 MONTHS is not an excuse for a bash.

    I didn't agree where the TARP WENT, I surely hated that the first porkulus bill was a TRILLION dollars with interest and the money disappeared down a rabbbilt hole. WHERE DID IT GO AND WHAT WAS IT FOR, a huge, unread bill in the middle of the night with NOT ONE REPUBLICAN SIGNATURE............rammed thru............It was said by Oilybama to be for SHOVEL READY PROJECTS, remember????

    So when he told us last summer that THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS A SHOVEL READY PROJECT, with a straight face AND NO MEDIA BASH and not explaining where our trillion dollars went :x ,

    I can't imagine anyone working one hour to re-elect this incompetent man.

    Trash McConnel for his sometime RHINO ways, for anything else, all for it, wanting to remove an incompetent

    is not a good reason...........

    The other side trained us that this is the way to treat a commander in chief, remember????.............


    it is called FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FOR BOTH SIDES

    now thank GOd you have never seen a conservative carrying the Democrat's 'Kill Bush' signs, then I would jump on your bandwagon..........

    .BUT SAYING YOU DISAGREE WITH EVERYTHING A very left of center man has said and done, nope............. free speech...........

    look around at the utter destruction in 24 months, you will be surprised in 23 months how many Americans feel just like Mitch does, November 2, was just the first of 3 removals of democrats

Comment on this post! (Requires free membership in the Implode-Explode forums!)


Page Rank